Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marton Fucsovics vs Christopher Eubanks Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fucsovics vs Eubanks analysis and find out who is favored!
Marton Fucsovics vs Christopher Eubanks Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fucsovics has won 58.27% of points on his second serve, while Eubanks has won 51.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fucsovics, in recent form, has won 51.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eubanks has won 38.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.39% and 23.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fucsovics has saved 68.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eubanks has saved 61.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fucsovics has won 61.11% of matches played (W/L 33/ 21), with Eubanks winning 48% (W/L 24/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fucsovics has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 33/ 24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 141/ 108). Eubanks has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 23/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 6/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Fucsovics has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11), where as Eubanks has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fucsovics has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.04 while Eubanks has played against players with an average rank of 130.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fucsovics has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eubanks has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fucsovics has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eubanks has converted 27.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fucsovics 0 - 0 Eubanks
50
Rank
31
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
43
Rank
29
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
57% (454-337)
Career Total W/L
56% (217-172)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
27% (4-11)
$4,322,904
Career Prize Money
$2,020,135
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marton Fucsovics | Christopher Eubanks |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 27% (4/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (35/20) | 31% (11/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (290/236) | 47% (167/192) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 25% (2/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 82% (9/2) | 0% (0/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.68 |
| Aces Total | 103 | 119 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:8 | 1:39:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.04 | 132.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (985/1596) | 71% (791/1117) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (688/985) | 70% (556/791) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 58% (356/611) | 52% (169/326) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (68/136) | 28% (20/72) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (630/1606) | 29% (303/1050) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 20% (1/4) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (11/5) | 20% (1/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (15/22) | 23% (3/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 0% (10/0) |
Marton Fucsovics Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alexandre Muller
Player
Marton Fucsovics
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Zachary Svajda
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Mariano Navone
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Corentin Moutet
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Valentin Vacherot
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Marton Fucsovics
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Eubanks Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Christopher Eubanks
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Christopher Eubanks
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Christopher Eubanks
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Christopher Eubanks
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Christopher Eubanks
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Christopher Eubanks
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
50 of
62)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Christopher Eubanks
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
10
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
7 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fucsovics Vs Eubanks Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
